Analog or digital?

The choice between analog and digital photography is less a technical decision than a commitment to the desired visual language – and to the creative process itself. Both media offer different advantages and challenges.

Analog photography, especially in medium format, celebrates a decelerated, mindful shooting process. It demands care and foresight – and promotes an intensive dialogue with the subject. This deliberate approach often results in thoughtful, artistic images, the basis of which is a physical negative: a unique piece of craftsmanship with a timeless aesthetic.

Film interprets light in a unique way. It creates gentle tonal gradations that make images appear organic, plastic, almost three-dimensional – a presence and spatiality that is difficult to emulate digitally.

It is precisely the often-called “intentional imperfections” of analogue medium format photography - fine grain, slightly soft focus, organic color reproduction - that can lend shots of architecture or interiors an unexpected emotional depth. Such images tell stories that go beyond mere documentation – and transform simple spatial images into silent works of art.

left: Analog – Kodak Portra 800 with Pentax 67 / SMC Pentax 67 45mm F4
right: Digital – Fujifilm GFX100s / Fujinon GF 20-35mm F4

However, the boundaries between analog and digital photography can also be permeable. I myself appreciate the hybrid approach in which, for example, the personality of legendary Pentax 67 lenses can be combined with a state-of-the-art digital medium format camera. The result is images that blend classic charm and modern precision.

hybrid setup: Fujifilm GFX100s with Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 6x7 135mm F4 Macro

Regardless of the medium chosen, the pursuit remains the same: not only to depict the world, but to make its poetry visible – be it in the silence of a room or in the expression of a face.